Saturday 1 November 2008

The Tomb of the Cybermen

The Doctor, Jamie and Victoria land on the planet Telos, where a group of archaeologists are excavating to find the lost tombs of the Cybermen. However, some of the party have their own motives for finding the tomb and when it is found, the Cybermen are not extinct as they thought.

The obvious inspiration for this story is The Mummy. The idea of a ruthless conquering race being archaeological curiosities, in the same way as the Romans and the Vikings adds a real sense of scale to the universe. The story is excellent visually- the sets and miniatures for the tombs are brilliantly designed and constructed and the location work is very impressive. Morris Barry knows how to construct a scene visually and how to use lighting to create mood. This makes the first two episodes very gripping as the tombs spring their deadly traps. The awakening of the Cybermen is brilliantly shot and scored and the cliffhanger for episode 2 is rightly iconic. Then the story crashes and burns. Big time

There were signs. Kaftan and Hopper are atrociously acted. Shirley Cooklin either smirks stupidly or blankly intones her dialogue. George Roubicek has the least expressive face and body language of any actor I have ever seen. To make up for this, he constantly moves his head from side to side when speaking. Characterisation is non-existent, but there are some good performances from some of the other actors. There is no good reason for Kaftan sealing the hatch to the tombs. However, this only hints at the rubbishness to come.

From the start of episode 3, the writers seemed to think the story didn't need a plot any more- it was enough to construct a series of set-pieces. This could work if the set-pieces weren't all idiotic- practically all of them have their own plot-hole. Why are the Cybermen unable to open the exit to their own tomb? Why are Kaftan and Klieg locked in the weapons room- with weapons? How does Klieg believe he can threaten the Cybermen with one gun? Why is the Cyberman Controller shut in the revitalisation chamber, which is then turned on? Why does the Doctor think that ropes can hold it shut? Why not just jump over the cybermats? I could go on.

The fact that the story literally 'loses the plot' damages the story irreparably. The Doctor's purpose is never made clear, which means he lets the archaeologists into the tomb, solves the logic puzzles to allow access to the Cybermen. Is this part of a grand scheme? No, because in the end, he just seals them up again. All the Doctor has done is allowed people to die who wouldn't have, had he not interfered. The Cybermen don't actually do much- they wander around a big room, replace Toberman's arm and, for some reason, quack a lot. None of the Cybermen leave the building- in fact only the Controller even leaves the cryonic chamber. This limits the story visually as well as dramatically.

There are two supporting characters that I wish to comment on. George Pastell's performance as Klieg is fascinating. Never before has such a charismatic screen presence been wedded to such an awful performance. Of course, it doesn't help that his dialogue is atrocious and the character is ludicrous. Pastell remains, however, interesting to watch. Then there is Toberman. If any aspect of this story has dated badly, it's the portrayal of a black man as a monosyllabic brutish slave. This, for once, is not the fault of the script (Davis and Pedler, for all their faults, went out of their way to portray black characters positively in their earlier scripts) and blame, unfortunately, must be apportioned to Morris Barry. It's interesting that Roy Stewart would play a similar sort of character in I, Claudius, nearly 10 years later but, with more subtle and skilful direction, the I, Claudius character is not offensive at all.

Troughton and Hines are on excellent form, Troughton still making the Doctor compelling, in spite of the fact that the script has no idea what to do with him. Watling is fine and her and Troughton share an excellent scene discussing the nature of bereavement that is better than the rest of the story combined.

The Tomb of the Cybermen
has long been a favourite with those who saw it when they were children. Unfortunately, when viewed by an adult (as I suppose I am) it comes off as being a story that starts with great promise, but is utterly wrecked by a script that nose-dives in quality half-way through and then gets exponentially more brainless by the minute.

NEXT: The Abominable Snowmen

No comments: