Doctor Who's 20th Anniversary was marked by this feature length episode. As expected, the story is primarily there to celebrate Doctor Who's history, of which there was a hell of a lot. Terrence Dicks's script was a last-minute rush job that juggled five Doctors and their companions and the usual array of guest characters, so it is a miracle that the story works so well. Dicks reuses a plot element from The War Games (kidnapping alien beings to do battle in a game) and uses it to give each Doctor breathing space in this convoluted affair and the quest aspect is well handled to bind the differing journeys together. The story is also a quest for the identity of the Doctor himself, something made explicit in the plot and also lying implicit in the story's aim to be a celebration. Gallifrey is again given a sense of history with great economy and Dicks includes a great deal of memorable dialogue in a script that shows his skill and consummate professionalism.
Peter Moffat is hardly the most visually adventurous director, but he does reasonably good work here. Despite Gallifrey having a similar look to Arc of Infinity, scenes are cut with more urgency which compensate for this. The locations are well shot, with some very atmospheric scenes in the caves, and there is some great matte painting work for the exterior of the Dark Tower and great set design for the interior. We get some of the series' most celebrated monsters, with the appearance of a Dalek and a Yeti, but the main 'monsters' are the Cybermen. These are of similar design to those in Earthshock but, unfortunately, the key touch that made this design so great (the silver jaw visible behind the face-plate) has been omitted. However, the Cybermen form part of perhaps the most memorable set-piece in the story, the Raston Warrior Robot. This is a shockingly violent scene, where a platoon of Cybermen are impaled and dismembered by the Robot. The Robot is instantly memorable in a scene that is immaculately shot and edited.
Of course, the main attraction is the appearance of the five Doctors themselves, although, in reality, this is really another 'three doctors'- William Hartnell had been dead for 8 years and Tom Baker declined to appear. Jon Pertwee and Patrick Troughton effortlessly ease back into their roles and their interplay with their companions is excellently written and performed. Tom Baker appears in the form of a scene from Shada, but the First Doctor has been recast. Doing an impersonation of the inimitable Hartnell would have been disastrous, so it is good that Richard Hurndall gives us his own interpretation- he doesn't giggle or go 'hmm', but we still believe in him as the Doctor. If it had been up to me, I would not have had the First Doctor in it, but Hurndall does a good enough job. The guest performances are good, with Phillip Latham's power-mad Borusa being a highlight. The characterisation of the Master as being thwarted in his attempts to help the Doctor is highly amusing and works well.
The Five Doctors is eminently successful in both celebrating the programme and entertaining the viewer. This is the first story where I have had to review two versions. In 1995, an extended edition was released with 'improved' special effects and extra scenes. However, there are only two actual improvements, in my opinion- the first entrance of Borusa and the Doctor going into Borusa's office are better edited, but, in general, the pace is lost in the new edit. Also, the iconic black trapezoid used to represent the time scoop has been needlessly replaced with what looks like a CGI ice cream. If you only have time for one, make it the original.
NEXT: Warriors of the Deep
Wednesday, 22 July 2009
"The Five Doctors"
Labels:
Brigadier,
Cybermen,
Davison,
jamie,
John Nathan-Turner,
K9,
Liz Shaw,
Master,
Mike Yates,
Pertwee,
Peter Moffat,
Sarah Jane,
Susan,
Tegan,
Terrence Dicks,
Time Lords,
Troughton,
Turlough,
Zoe
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I can't help but see this story for what it could've been, given all the difficulties that went on behind the scenes. Not only was Hartnell dead and Tom Baker refusing to appear, but none of the 2nd Doctor's companions were able to commit much of their time to this. So, even though the Brigadier works splendidly with the 2nd Doctor, the scene with Jamie and Zoe does rip an enormous plothole into the Doctor Who universe.
I agree with you about Hurndall, though. Not bad at all. It was odd for them to have a clip of Hartnell opening the story, however, as the difference in appearance between he and Hurndall is hard to ignore.
I love how Davison gets along with other three. The Susan and Turlough scenes are also pretty interesting.
I was disappointed that none of the Doctors except Davison and Hurndall interact until the end, and even then they're mostly reciting technobabble. The Three Doctors had pretty pedestrian plot and effects, but it was great watching Troughton and Pertwee bicker.
Yay for grown-up Susan though.
Post a Comment